Should we now postpone Doyle, because Munson is an innocent purchaser subsequent to the date of his agreement, then Munson would have to be postponed in his turn, should some one appear to-morrow, and produce a deed executed between the 26th of May and filie 26th of June, 1835, because, he would be a subsequent bona fide purchaser!

Doyle v. Teas, 5 Ill. (Scam) 202 (Illinois, Dec. 1, 1843)

Times reported as typo: 0